Marketing Monkeys

January19

Dan Myer dy/dan » Blog Archive » Sinister Storytelling takes on criticism from Tom Hoffman about the recent Annual Report contest, and whether it’s about storytelling, or merely marketing. He feels that trying to ape corporations with our personal reports will lead something less than substantive.

So which is it?

A mere means of pushing a product. or, one of the first pieces of visual propaganda used on a mass basis

ABC_Barbara_Hale from PopKulture’s photostream on Flickr – Photo Sharing!

British Slave Ship Poster (from LOC via Wikipedia)

I’ve had my own criticisms about the contest, and the posting of numbers without an underlying narrative point, or a worthwhile point. I think Tom’s points are good ones and worth considering when doing projects like this. My take-away from what he has said is, yes it looks nice, but what are you saying? What is your message? What are you asking people to do? Was it effective?

If your answer is, “Well, I just shared that I know how to type and can generate lots of words, because I wrote 300 posts last year,” that might not be impressive. If that is part of a small series of metrics showing you wrote 300 posts, and they were well read and received, that is because it says you are part of a community, and you are giving something of value to that community.

I think it’s not the design itself, but your motives and your execution. Look, “Joe Hill” and “Plop, plop, fizz, fizz” are both catchy tunes, and both were used for marketing. I don’t hold with thinking that says propaganda is bad, because it’s been a critical part of a lot of movements I like and respect.

What does doing a report on ourselves have to do with that? Well, first reflection is NEVER a bad thing. I looked at the contest as part of that process. I also looked at it as practice in making good visual data graphics (although I lamed out on that, I think I may do more as I’m working with more numbers in the coming months). If it is marketing, then it is more in the realm of persuasive, writing (which can involve narrative). Students are required to learn about and create persuasive writing. It makes sense to also think about teaching them how to persuade people using visual media, not just words.

I think teaching students how to make documents in that family of visuals is a worthwhile expenditure of school time. Will everyone make something eloquent or important — not always. In creating pieces like that though you can learn to appreciate good visuals even more, and question ones that are either inaccurate, or just pointless.

And design is not just about corporatism, look at the Bauhuas, a substantive design movement, grounded in social theory about eliminating class distinction in design.


Bauhaus, Dessau, Germany from Rashunda’s photostream on Flickr – Photo Sharing!

I’ll reflect in my next post about how I have used what I’ve learned and done in both of Dan’s contest to communicate to my peers, my students, and my parents about what I’m doing in my lab.

Further reading on this subject:

Unbrand America from Ende’s photostream on Flickr – Photo Sharing!

TED | Talks | Paola Antonelli: Treating design as art (video)

Creating Lifelong Learners » Blog Archive » Design and Storytelling in Film

Email will not be published

Website example

Your Comment:

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

rssrss
rssrss

Subscribe by email

Manage Your Subscriptions

Visitors come from...

Support the Save Our Schools March

License

All of Ms. Mercer's text, lessons, graphics, etc. are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 License. Creative Commons License

Howdy! I teach fifth grade at an elementary school in Sacramento, CA. I started my career in Oakland, Ca, and moved here to Sacramento in 2001.

My goals are:

  1. To reflect on how I am teaching, and how effective my practices are;
  2. To integrate and embed technology in the curriculum I teach; and,
  3. To network with other like-minded educators.

To help me reach my goals, I use this blog as a place for me to reflect on best practices, and the practices I’m (trying to) putting in place in my classroom.

My philosophy of teaching is pragmatic (I’ll use what works, and I’m not particularly wed to one theory or another). I want students thinking critically, and engaged in what they are learning (Constructivism), but I know that many of my students (language learners and others) need schema, scaffolding, and explicit modeling, so I’m not afraid to use those as well.

My philosophy of technology education is that teaching comes first, but technology is an awesome tool to use to engage students, and help them create stuff. I prefer that the learning goal guide the use of technology, and not the other way around.

That’s the big picture. Other salient details are that I can be sharp, but I prefer to see the positive and connect with others rather than fighting and argufying. I can be hard on others (having high expectations), but no harder than I am on myself.

I can be contacted here.

Disclaimer

The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not those of Sacramento City Unified School District.